ยินดีต้อนรับ

พลเมืองที่รอบรู้เท่าทัน คือ พลังประชาธิปไตยที่แท้จริง
Well-informed citizens are the true democratic forces.

Saturday, July 27, 2024

Thailand & Efforts to Join the International Criminal Court (ICC)

 Thailand has not joined the International Criminal Court (ICC). However, there have been discussions and considerations over the years regarding its potential membership. Here are some chronological details about Thailand and its stance on joining the ICC:

  1. 1998: The Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court, was adopted on July 17, 1998. Thailand participated in the negotiations but did not sign the treaty at this time.
  2. 2002: The Rome Statute entered into force on July 1, 2002, after 60 countries ratified it. Thailand continued to observe the ICC's development without committing to membership.
  3. 2003: Thailand signed the Rome Statute on October 2, 2003, signaling its initial intent to join the ICC. However, signing the statute is only the first step, and ratification is required to become a full member.
  4. Post-2003: Despite signing the Rome Statute, Thailand has not ratified it. Ratification would require changes to national legislation and political commitment, which successive Thai governments have not undertaken.
  5. 2006-2014: Political instability in Thailand, including military coups in 2006 and 2014, contributed to the lack of progress toward ICC ratification. Political priorities during these periods focused on domestic issues rather than international commitments.
  6. 2012: The Thai Ministry of Justice's Rights and Liberties Protection Department conducted a public seminar to discuss the implications of joining the ICC. The seminar aimed to educate the public and stakeholders about the ICC and gather opinions on whether Thailand should proceed with ratification.
  7. 2014-Present: Political and legal reforms have continued to be a focus in Thailand, but the issue of ICC ratification has not been prioritized. Human rights organizations and civil society groups have periodically advocated for Thailand to ratify the Rome Statute and join the ICC.

In summary, while Thailand signed the Rome Statute in 2003, it has not ratified the treaty and therefore is not a member of the International Criminal Court. Political instability and domestic priorities have influenced this decision, and discussions about joining the ICC remain ongoing.


What can be done to push Thailand toward ratifying the Rome Statute?


Pushing Thailand toward ratifying the Rome Statute involves a combination of domestic advocacy, international pressure, and comprehensive education on the benefits and implications of joining the International Criminal Court (ICC). Here are several strategies that could be employed:

  1. Domestic Advocacy and Public Awareness:
    • Public Campaigns: Increase public awareness about the ICC and the Rome Statute through campaigns, seminars, and educational programs. Highlight the importance of international justice and the benefits of ratification for Thailand.
    • Engage Civil Society: Encourage civil society organizations, human rights groups, and legal professionals to advocate for ratification. These groups can play a crucial role in lobbying the government and educating the public.
    • Media Engagement: Utilize traditional and social media to disseminate information about the ICC, its role, and why Thailand should join. Media coverage can help generate public interest and support.
  1. Political Engagement:
    • Lobby Government Officials: Engage with key government officials, including members of parliament, the Ministry of Justice, and the Prime Minister's Office, to advocate for ratification. Present them with well-researched arguments and data on the benefits of joining the ICC.
    • Parliamentary Support: Work with sympathetic members of parliament to introduce and support legislation necessary for ratification. Building a coalition of lawmakers who back the ICC can be crucial.
    • Political Parties: Encourage political parties to include ICC ratification in their platforms and manifestos. This can help make the issue a part of the broader political discourse.
  1. International Pressure and Support:
    • Diplomatic Engagement: Other ICC member states can engage in diplomatic efforts to encourage Thailand to ratify the Rome Statute. This can include bilateral discussions, as well as advocacy through regional organizations like ASEAN.
    • International Organizations: Work with international organizations, such as the United Nations and the ICC itself, to provide support and pressure for ratification. These organizations can offer technical assistance and guidance on implementing necessary legal reforms.
    • Peer Pressure: Highlight the fact that many of Thailand's regional and international peers have joined the ICC. Emphasize the benefits these countries have gained from membership.
  1. Addressing Concerns and Misconceptions:
    • Legal Reforms: Provide technical assistance and expertise to help Thailand align its domestic laws with the requirements of the Rome Statute. Address any legal concerns that may be hindering ratification.
    • Clarify Sovereignty Issues: Address concerns about sovereignty and the perceived loss of judicial independence. Explain how the ICC operates on the principle of complementarity, which respects national judicial systems.
    • Military and Security Concerns: Engage with the military and security sectors to address their concerns about ICC jurisdiction and potential implications for national security. Assure them that the ICC focuses on serious international crimes and that a strong national judicial system can mitigate concerns about ICC intervention.
  1. Educational Initiatives:
    • Academic Research: Promote academic research and publications on the ICC and its relevance to Thailand. Encourage universities and research institutions to study and disseminate findings on the benefits of ratification.
    • Workshops and Training: Organize workshops and training sessions for legal professionals, government officials, and civil society representatives on the ICC and the Rome Statute. Provide detailed information on the ratification process and its implications.

By combining these strategies, stakeholders can create a multifaceted approach to encourage Thailand to ratify the Rome Statute and join the International Criminal Court.

Lesson 9: Learning Grammar Through Conversations by Dr. Snea Thinsan

Lesson 9: Learning Grammar Through Conversations by Dr. Snea Thinsan

Lesson 9: Learning Grammar Through Conversations by Dr. Snea Thinsan

(Present Simple vs. Present Continuous)

A: "What ___ you usually do on weekends?"

B: "I usually ___ hiking."



Answer: a) do / go - Present Simple is used for habitual actions, and 'go' is the correct form after 'usually.'

(Third Conditional)

A: "If I ___ harder, I would have passed the test."

B: "Don't worry, you can try again."



Answer: c) had studied - Third Conditional uses 'if' + past perfect to talk about hypothetical past situations.

(Relative Pronouns)

A: "The woman ___ works at the bakery is very friendly."

B: "Yes, I like her a lot."



Answer: b) who - 'Who' is used for people in relative clauses.

(Modals of Permission)

A: "___ I leave early today?"

B: "Yes, you can."



Answer: c) May - 'May' is used to ask for permission.

(Past Perfect vs. Past Simple)

A: "By the time we arrived, the movie ___. "

B: "That's too bad."



Answer: a) had started - Past Perfect is used for actions completed before another action in the past.

(Adverbs of Frequency)

A: "He ___ goes to the gym, that's why he's so fit."

B: "I should go more often too."



Answer: c) always - Adverbs of frequency describe how often something happens.

(Conditionals: Type 1)

A: "If it ___ tomorrow, we will go to the beach."

B: "I hope it does!"



Answer: a) doesn't rain - First Conditional uses 'if' + present simple to describe future possibilities.

(Passive Voice: Present Simple)

A: "English ___ all over the world."

B: "Yes, it's a very popular language."



Answer: b) is spoken - Passive Voice in Present Simple is formed with 'is' + past participle.

(Reported Speech: Commands)

A: "She told me to ___ the door."

B: "Did you do it?"



Answer: a) close - Reported Speech for commands uses the base form of the verb.

(Comparative Adjectives)

A: "This bag is ___ than the one I bought last year."

B: "It looks sturdier too."



Answer: a) more expensive - Comparative adjectives are used to compare two things.