"CRITICAL" in CONTEXTS

Snea Thinsan
Language Education, School of Education,
Indiana University
Return
 Home.
 

Educators in most parts of the world are using the word 'critical' when they discuss ideas about education in response to, I think, their dissatisfaction with the traditional schooling or education. The word is so frequently used in many contexts that I find myself confused about the exact meaning of 'critical literacy'.

This page shows how the word 'critical' is used in several online articles that deal with 'critical' literacy. Several articles were concordanced, and the results are shown below. I hope it is of interest and use for many.

Special thanks to the websites used below and, especially, to the web concordancer kindly offered by spaceless.com.

 

http://faculty.ed.uiuc.edu/burbules/ncb/papers/critical.html

1629 sentences were found.
234 sentences contained the "critical".

Displaying only the first 50 matching sentences

Sentence 1

Critical Thinking and Critical Pedagogy Critical Thinking and

Critical

Pedagogy: Relations, Differences, and Limits Nicholas C

Sentence 3

Burbules and Rupert Berk Department of Educational Policy Studies Published in

Critical

Theories in Education, Thomas S

Sentence 11

Two literatures have shaped much of the writing in the educational foundations over the past two decades: Critical Thinking and

Critical

Pedagogy

Sentence 15

Each invokes the term

critical

as a valued educational goal: urging teachers to help students become more skeptical toward commonly accepted truisms

Sentence 21

They share a passion and sense of urgency about the need for more

critical

ly oriented classrooms

Sentence 25

Is this because they propose conflicting visions of what

critical

thought entails

Sentence 33

Are there other ways to think about becoming

critical

that stand outside these traditions, but which hold educational significance

Sentence 39

We will begin by contrasting Critical Thinking and Critical Pedagogy in terms of their conception of what it means to be

critical

 

Sentence 47

These lines of reciprocal and external criticism, in turn, lead us to suggest some different ways to think about

critical

ity

Sentence 51

At a broad level, Critical Thinking and

Critical

Pedagogy share some common concerns

Sentence 55

They share a concern with how these inaccuracies, distortions, and falsehoods limit freedom, though this concern is more explicit in the

Critical

Pedagogy tradition, which sees society as fundamentally divided by relations of unequal power

Sentence 57

 

Critical

Pedagogues are specifically concerned with the influences of educational knowledge, and of cultural formations generally, that perpetuate or legitimate an unjust status quo

Sentence 59

fostering a

critical

capacity in citizens is a way of enabling them to resist such power effects

Sentence 61

 

Critical

Pedagogues take sides, on behalf of those groups who are disenfranchised from social, economic, and political possibilities

Sentence 63

Many

Critical

Thinking authors would cite similar concerns, but regard them as subsidiary to the more inclusive problem of people basing their life choices on unsubstantiated truth claims —

Sentence 67

For Critical Thinking advocates, all of us need to be better critical thinkers, and there is often an implicit hope that enhanced

critical

thinking could have a general humanizing effect, across all social groups and classes

Sentence 69

In this sense, both Critical Thinking and Critical Pedagogy authors would argue that by helping to make people more

critical

in thought and action, progressively minded educators can help to free learners to see the world as it is and to act accordingly

Sentence 71

 

critical

education can increase freedom and enlarge the scope of human possibilities

Sentence 77

The Critical Thinking tradition concerns itself primarily with criteria of epistemic adequacy: to be

critical

basically means to be more discerning in recognizing faulty arguments, hasty generalizations, assertions lacking evidence, truth claims based on unreliable authority, ambiguous or obscure concepts, and so forth

Sentence 79

For the

Critical

Thinker, people do not sufficiently analyze the reasons by which they live, do not examine the assumptions, commitments, and logic of daily life

Sentence 93

The prime tools of

Critical

Thinking are the skills of formal and informal logic, conceptual analysis, and epistemology

Sentence 95

The primary preoccupation of

Critical

Thinking is to supplant sloppy or distorted thinking with thinking based upon reliable procedures of inquiry

Sentence 101

For the Critical Thinking tradition, as Harvey Siegel states,

critical

thinking aims at self-sufficiency, and a self-sufficient person is a liberated person

Sentence 111

The

Critical

Pedagogy tradition begins from a very different starting point

Sentence 117

The primary preoccupation of

Critical

Pedagogy is with social injustice and how to transform inequitable, undemocratic, or oppressive institutions and social relations

Sentence 119

At some point, assessments of truth or conceptual slipperiness might come into the discussion (different writers in the

Critical

Pedagogy tradition differ in this respect), but they are in the service of demonstrating how certain power effects occur, not in the service of pursuing Truth in some dispassioned sense (Burbules 1992/1995)

Sentence 135

Such questions, from the

Critical

Pedagogy perspective, are not external to, or separable from, the import of also weighing the evidentiary base for such claims

Sentence 139

Now, the

Critical

Thinking response to this approach will be that these are simply two different, perhaps both valuable, endeavors

Sentence 147

That sort of critique might also be worthwhile (we suspect that most

Critical

Thinking authors would say that it is worthwhile), but it depends on a different sort of analysis, with a different burden of argument —

Sentence 153

The response, in turn, from the

Critical

Pedagogy point of view is that the two levels cannot be kept separate because the standards of epistemic adequacy themselves (valid argument, supporting evidence, conceptual clarity, and so on) and the particular ways in which these standards are invoked and interpreted in particular settings inevitably involve the very same considerations of who, where, when, and why that any other social belief claims raise

Sentence 159

But neither the Critical Thinking nor the

Critical

Pedagogy tradition is monolithic or homogeneous, and a closer examination of each reveals further dimensions of these similarities and differences

Sentence 161

 

Critical

Thinking

Sentence 163

A concern with

critical

thinking in education, in the broad sense of teaching students the rules of logic or how to assess evidence, is hardly new: it is woven throughout the Western tradition of education, from the Greeks to the Scholastics to the present day

Sentence 167

What the

Critical

Thinking movement has emphasized is the idea that specific reasoning skills undergird the curriculum as a whole

Sentence 169

that the purpose of education generally is to foster

critical

thinking

Sentence 171

and that the skills and dispositions of

critical

thinking can and should infuse teaching and learning at all levels of schooling

Sentence 173

 

Critical

thinking is linked to the idea of rationality itself, and developing rationality is seen as a prime, if not the prime, aim of education (see, for example, Siegel 1988)

Sentence 183

To Critical Thinking, the critical person is something like a

critical

consumer of information

Sentence 189

Much of the literature in this area, especially early on, seemed to be devoted to lists and taxonomies of what a

critical

thinker should know and be able to do (Ennis 1962, 1980)

Sentence 191

More recently, however, various authors in this tradition have come to recognize that teaching content and skills is of minor import if learners do not also develop the dispositions or inclination to look at the world through a

critical

lens

Sentence 193

By this, Critical Thinking means that the

critical

person has not only the capacity (the skills) to seek reasons, truth, and evidence, but also that he or she has the drive (disposition) to seek them

Sentence 195

For instance, Ennis claims that a

critical

person not only should seek reasons and try to be well informed, but that he or she should have a tendency to do such things (Ennis 1987, 1996)

Sentence 197

Siegel criticizes Ennis somewhat for seeing dispositions simply as what animates the skills of critical thinking, because this fails to distinguish sufficiently the critical thinker from

critical

thinking

Sentence 199

For Siegel, a cluster of dispositions (the

critical

spirit) is more like a deep-seated character trait, something like Scheffler’

Sentence 205

It is part of

critical

thinking itself

Sentence 207

Paul also stresses this distinction between skills and dispositions in his distinction between weak-sense and strong-sense

critical

thinking

Sentence 215

According to Paul, a

critical

thinker in the strong sense has a passionate drive for clarity, accuracy, and fairmindedness (Paul 1983, 23

Sentence 221

This dispositional view of

critical

thinking has real advantages over the skills-only view

Sentence 225

First, it is not clear exactly what is entailed by making such dispositions part of

critical

thinking

Sentence 227

In our view it not only broadens the notion of criticality beyond mere logicality, but it necessarily requires a greater attention to institutional contexts and social relations than

Critical

Thinking authors have provided

 

concordance of words in this documents by frequency

showing the most common 250

9895 words in this document

2063 distinct words identified

 

 


 

http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/pubs/98tk/tk13.html 

519 sentences were found.
36 sentences contained the "critical".

Displaying only the first 50 matching sentences

Sentence 1

Tied Knowledge, chapter 13: Critical teaching and research

Critical

teaching and research  

Sentence 15

In this chapter I discuss the potential for

critical

teaching and research, and some of the limitations of the usual approaches to doing this

Sentence 19

 

Critical

teaching Teaching in academia is conditioned by several forces, notably control over entry into occupations by credentials, control over the content and process of teaching by teachers and administrators, and control over course content by members of the discipline

Sentence 31

Such factors greatly influence the prospects for

critical

teaching

Sentence 47

Why do some academics introduce

critical

content into their courses

Sentence 49

Quite frequently, they are concerned about social issues--such as housing for the poor, the arms race or racism--and realise that the usual courses shortchange

critical

perspectives

Sentence 53

Sometimes--though this is never admitted--the critical content is used by academics to stake out a domain of expertise and to increase individual status as a

critical

intellectual

Sentence 83

Sometimes the interest of a particular academic, plus student demand, is sufficient to establish a

critical

subject as a regular option

Sentence 117

Much critical content is not very

critical

so far as students are concerned

Sentence 129

When students choose what and how they learn, they are more likely to develop

critical

perspectives--or so radical academics hope

Sentence 277

 

Critical

research Academic freedom, in one of its senses, is supposed to allow scholars to pursue their inquiries without fear or favour

Sentence 279

But very few academics actually do any research which has more than the mildest

critical

edge

Sentence 287

Precisely because

critical

research is so seldom done, it can be one of the more effective ways for academics working inside the system to challenge knowledge tied to powerful groups

Sentence 289

 

Critical

researchers can use the system against itself by using the public perception that claims about knowledge made by professional credentialed scholars are more legitimate than the same claims made by other people

Sentence 291

What sort of

critical

research can be done

Sentence 311

In doing

critical

research, there are a number of dangers and pitfalls

Sentence 315

Often the attacks come from inside the university and are mounted by administrators or academics who see

critical

research as a threat to the usual way in which academic knowledge tied to particular interest groups

Sentence 317

An example is the attempt by academics within the Australian National University to block publication of the book The Fight For the Forests by Richard and Val Routley, which was very

critical

of forestry planning and practice

Sentence 323

Although direct attacks on